Tables fall into the general class of flowing film concentrators
were the primary means of separation is a flowing film combined with
stratification. They utilize the principal of flowing film
separation, and combine this with bed stratification to enhance
recovery and increase capacity.
The general principal is a feed stream a rate where the
coarse heavy particles settle to form a bed which then aids the
concentration of finer heavy particles.
The lighter particles are then carried away by the flow of
water. For more information on how tables work see
SDM an Introduction to the
Flowing Film Concentration .
Tables as they are currently used (with a differential
motion) were first introduced in 1890 by Arthur Wilfley, but derive
from earlier bumping tables developed in the early 1800’s.
Figure 1: Typical Table
TYPICAL CIRCUIT
Tables are normally used as part of a larger plant where they treat
the finer particle size range or as a secondary cleaning circuit,
processing a jig concentrate.
Figure 2 : Typical Table Circuit
Tables are usually used in sets of two or more and the circuit
consists of a feed distributor, the tables, a wash water circuit,
and a heavy and flight fraction collection system.
Some multi stage table installation have been used for
separating different products, but generally tables are used in a
single stage.
Tables are used for treating material less than 1½
inch (75 mm), and primarily
½ inch (12 mm) x 28 mesh (0.6 mm) material.
Tables have been used down to 200 mesh (75 microns)
successfully. The most
generally accepted explanation of the action of a concentrating
table is that as the material to be treated is fanned out over the
table deck by the differential motion and gravitational flow, the
particles become stratified in layers behind the riffles. This
stratification is followed by the removal of successive layers from
the top downward by cross-flowing water as the stratified bed
travels toward the outer end of the table.
The cross-flowing water is made up partly of water introduced
with the feed and partly of wash water fed separately through
troughs along the upper side of the table.
The progressive removal of material from the top toward the
bottom of the bed is the result of the taper of the table riffles
toward their outer end, which allows successively deeper layer of
material to be carried away by the cross-flowing water as the outer
end of the table is approached.
By the time the end of the table is reached, only a thin
layer, probably not thicker than one or two particles, remains on
the surface of the deck, this being finally discharged over the end
of the table.
Tables come in many different configurations, primarily in deck
design (riffling pattern). Other
than that the main difference is in the number of decks.
Mineral jigs have traditionally been single deck units, while
coal tables have used multi-deck arrangements.
Single deck tables are commonly floor mounted, while
multi-deck tables are usually suspended from over head structure.
Figure 3 – Single Deck Table
TABLE OPERATION
The most used adjustment factors are table slope, stroke frequency
and stroke length.
Additionally the amount of water, both with the feed and as wash
water are important.
The table tilt (cross slope) is the inclination of the table from
the feed toward the long side. This slope should be set to the
minimum at which it is possible to obtain good distribution of
material on the table deck. An increase in slope is required when
the bed is thick or sluggish or when there is insufficient water
available. An increase in the slope tends to carry more material to
the long side of the table (lighter material).
The length and frequency of stroke are interdependent variables.
With coarse feeds, a long stroke and slow speed is used, whereas
short strokes and higher speeds are used for fine sands and slimes.
Normal operating ranges are from 230 to 285 rpm and 1 1/4"
to 3/4" stroke for coarse feeds and
285 to 325 rpm and 3/4" to
1/8" stroke for finer material. Speeds and strokes for tabling coal
are about the same as for minerals.
A longer stroke moves the heavy particles to the discharge
end of the table more rapidly, but more water is required.
lncreasing the length of the
stroke requires a decrease in the frequency of strokes and vice
versa to maintain the same speed of heavy particle travel. When the
differences in specific gravity between ore and associated
impurities are small, the stroke length must be shortened.
Common starting points are
275 strokes/minute with a 1” stroke length.
They are then adjusted, along with wash water to get the
desired heavy fraction line to report at the desired location along
the short edge of the deck.
The higher operating speeds of modern tables result in
greater mobility, greater capacity, and increased operating
efficiency.
Water consumption is dependent on the size of feed and type of
operation; i.e., roughing or cleaning. In roughing 25% by weight
water is required. In cleaning, more water is used, ranging up to
20% by weight water. Slime ore treatment water requirements are from
20% to 25% by weight water.
Table 1 – Water
Requirements
3/4"
30% to 40%
1/4"
50%
28 mesh
30% to 40%
Tables are sized on the feed tonnage per unit of deck area.
Different types of feed will require different sizing
criteria. Specifically
coal tables have different sizing criteria than mineral tables.
This is most often due to the size range of feed.
Coal tables are commonly fed a coarser feed than mineral
tables (a general observation is that coal is cleaned at coarser
sizes than minerals, primarily due to liberation sizes).
Coal |
|
Feed Size |
T/hr Per Deck |
3/4" x 28 Mesh |
15 |
3/8" or 1/4" x 28 Mesh |
12.5 |
1/8" x 28 Mesh |
10 |
28 Mesh x 0 |
5 |
Minerals |
T/hr Per Deck |
> 3 mm (Sand) |
>5 |
3 mm x 1 mm |
5 |
1mm x 100 micron |
3 |
100 micron x 0 |
2 |
< 100 micron |
1 |
The following is an example of sizing and selecting a
equipment name.
It is included for reference only.
In actual practice many different factors can cause the
specific selection to change.
1/4" x 28 mesh (6.5 mm x 0.6 mm)
1.50 separating gravity
80% (at 1.50 Sp.Gr.) reporting to clean coal.
From table 2, 1/4" x 28 mesh coal is 12.5 t/hr per deck, so 50 t/hr
would require four (4) decks.
This could be handled with two (2) double deck units.
o
40+
years’ experience in the mining industry with strong mineral
processing experience in Precious metals, copper, industrial
minerals, coal, and phosphate
o
Operational experience in precious metals, coal, and phosphate plus
in petrochemicals.
o
Extensive experience studies and feasibility in the US and
international (United States, Canada, Mexico, Ecuador, Columbia,
Venezuela, Chile, China, India, Indonesia, and Greece).