How much is that
battery in the window?
An old song talked about the cost of a dog in a
pet store window. Which while nice to have, maybe too expensive. We
may be getting there with the hopes for electric vehicles.
Some recent posts, by supposedly knowledgeable
people have predicted that all the cars or vehicles on the road will
be electric in the next 50 years. Sounds nice for the environment
(maybe), but what does it mean. For a more reasonable look let’s
assume that 5 to 10% of the new vehicles by 2030 will be
electric/battery.
In 2014 it was estimated that 70 million new
cars and another20 million new commercial vehicles were sold
worldwide. It has also
been reported that this number is growing at 2.5% per year. For
arguments sake let us look forward about 14 years to 2030. This says
that there will be about 100 million new cars and 30+million new
commercial vehicles sold that year, for a total of about 130 million
new vehicles.
For a conservative point, let’s assume that
between 5 to 10 million of these are electric and using Li-ion
batteries (currently commercially available). Based on an average
size passenger vehicle (Chevy Volt or equivalent) these will each
have a 16 kWhr battery pack good for around 100+ miles on a charge.
Also considering current commercial technology each of these
batteries will require about 16 kg Lithium, 16 kg of
carbon/Graphite), and 8 kg of cobalt. Or 80,000 to 160,000 tons of
lithium, same for carbon (graphite), and 40,000 to 80,000 tons of
cobalt. We could also talk about the rare earths for magnets and
displays, but that just makes it more complicated for this
discussion.
In 2014 according to USGS world production (for
all uses) was 36,000 tons of lithium, to reach the projected goals,
amounts to a 100% to 400% expansion of lithium product. The good
news is that almost everywhere you can find talk about a new lithium
project. But to reach those production levels (and allowing for all
the other uses for lithium) is going to require a lot of new mines.
The USGS also listed the world production of
natural graphite at 1,200 tons in 2014. A large portion of the
carbon/graphite used in batteries is synthetic graphite from coke.
So this is not as bad as it sounds, still with petroleum refining
down, and the same for coal mining, this source may also be
constrained.
World cobalt production in 2014 (again from
USGS) was 112,000 tons; there are some substitutes that can be made
for the cobalt, but not many.
Also the main source of cobalt is byproducts of other metals
production and from Democratic Republic of the Congo.
If you now look at the optimistic (?) view all
of the above numbers can double. And yes there are other substitutes
and new technologies for batteries, but none in the near term
commercial point (assuming 5 to 10 years from concept to full scale
use).
So what does this mean today? There are a lot
of people looking at lithium, and there are a lot of lithium
projects and sources. Enough, maybe, maybe not, but definitely going
to get more expensive.
Graphite/carbon production might be okay, but maybe not also. Count
on the cost going up. Cobalt can be the problem; there will in all
likelihood be a cobalt shortage. There are some existing
technologies that use other metals, (such as nickel and manganese)
but they are generally slightly less efficient.
So that pretty little battery and the vehicle
it is in will in all likelihood become more expensive and there are
going to be a lot more mines out there.
Glass to Batteries to Drugs – lithium
Lithium with an atomic number of 3 is a soft, silver-white metal, it
is the lightest metal and the least dense solid element. As I
mentioned in a previous post (1) it is often confused with the rare
earth elements primarilary due to its usage, but it should properly
be classed as a rare metal instead.
It may be surprising to some, but the main use of lithium is not in
batteries, but in ceramics and glass. From the USGS 2015 report
(2014 data):
“global end-use
markets are estimated as follows: ceramics and glass, 35%;
batteries, 31%; lubricating greases, 8%; continuous casting mold
flux powders, 6%; air treatment, 5%; polymer production, 5%; primary
aluminum production, 1%; and other uses, 9%.”
USGS
further anticipates that lithium for batteries will continue to
increase and become the main use (but still less than 50%).
Hardrock to brine - changing production of lithium
Lithium is the thirty-third most frequently occurring mineral so it
is not exactly scare, but concentrations are generally too low, and
extraction too difficult and costly to be economic. Lithium has
historically been produced from two sources: hard rock mining and
brines. A third source, hectorite clays, has been identified but
production methods are still in development.
The
traditional hard-rock mining is from pegmatites (pegmatite:
intrusive igneous rock composed of interlocking crystals usually
larger than 2.5 cm (1 inch)) containing the lithium bearing silicate
spudomene. The industry
was once dominated by two major U.S. pegmatite (hard rock mineral)
producers, until a third producer from Chile started production in
the 1980s of various salts from brine.
When I was young my dad worked at the then Foote Mineral hardrock
mine near Kings Mountain, NC, the majority of their production is
hardly used today, and new uses are gaining ground.
This
shift in sources, due to the capital cost and energy and time
required for conventional mining and processing, led to the shutdown
of the U.S. pegmatite operations; however some pegmatites from
Australia, Canada and Zimbabwe, that contain high-grade spodumene
and petalite, continue to be important sources of lithium mineral
concentrates for the ceramic and glass industry and other
applications.
Today
the majority of lithium is produced from brine.
South America accounted for 60% of world output of lithium in
2008, followed by Australia and China which combined produced 30% of
the total. Two-thirds of the world production was from brines and
one-third from lithium minerals.
In
many cases, the primary production from brines is potassium
compounds (potash) with lithium produced as a by-product. As a
result of extensive exploration for brine deposits, prompted by
lithium production development first in Nevada and later Chile;
several deposits were identified and explored in Argentina, Bolivia,
China and Tibet.
Currently two brine operations are active in the United States; one
located in Clayton Valley, Nevada, and the other in the Salton Sea
region of California.
The Clayton Valley facility was opened in 1967 and has been
producing lithium carbonate from brines ever since.
The
hard rock mining process utilizes a fairly standard crushing,
grinding, and flotation circuit.
Extracting and processing lithium from brine deposits is relatively
simple and low cost. The process relies on evaporation, which is
dictated by solar and wind rates, as well as elevation. With lithium
brine processing, we are letting nature do the work.
Brine
is typically pumped from subsurface aquifers, through a circuit of
evaporation ponds to increase concentration.
Generally, lithium is found with other compounds that are sold as
co-products. Co-products such as potassium and boron can be very
significant contributors to the overall project economics, and in
certain cases can significantly offset the cost of producing
lithium.
While
the clay depsoits have not been exploited much, Western Lithium is
developing a process for hectorite clays in Nevada (2)
The
main lithium chemicals are either lithium carbonate or lithium
chloride, which with the hard rock operations require further
chemical processing.
The brines produce these as the basic output.
The
market is expected to grow and it is anticipated that new
incremental sources of lithium will be required to meet the growth
in demand that is predicted for battery applications. Battery
manufacturers are expected to be looking for new lithium sources
that can provide a long term supply of high quality lithium
carbonate, are scalable to keep pace with demand growth, and provide
geographic diversity of supply.
The
economics of obtaining lithium carbonate from brine are so favorable
that most hard rock production has been priced out of the market.
Lithium brines are currently the only lithium source that can
support mining without significant other credits from tantalum,
niobium, tin etc., (low manganese content within Nevada’s Clayton
Valley brines significantly reduces recovery costs unlike Chile’s
high manganese content brine deposits). Lithium brine resources are
now the preferred method of lithium recovery.
Recovering lithium from brines is not considered hard rock mining,
it is classified the same as placer and permitting is much easier
and quicker.
Lithium recovery from brines could lead to a huge carbon footprint
reduction because of a nearly zero-waste mining method. Once the
lithium is recovered the chemicals used can be recycled, also the
by-products include saleable compounds such as potash and/or boron.
Beyond Lithium to Cobalt, an important but
overlooked component
Above, I mentioned that many batteries are up
to 25% cobalt, and that projected car and truck battery use
(assuming Li-ion batteries, still the most common commercially and
for the next 5+ years) would require between 40,000 and 80,000
tonnes of cobalt. Which exceed all current (2015) cobalt use in
batteries.
Cobalt has many uses, of which batteries are
the main use, and growing.
Use |
% |
Tonnes |
|||
Superalloys |
22% |
37,889 |
|||
Batteries |
23% |
39,611 |
|||
Catalysts |
11% |
18,944 |
|||
Hard metals |
11% |
18,944 |
|||
Pigments |
9% |
15,500 |
|||
Soaps |
8% |
13,778 |
|||
Magnets |
7% |
12,056 |
|||
Other |
9% |
15,500 |
|||
Total |
|
172,222 |
|||
The other uses are also very important. Cobalt
is used in alloys for aircraft engine parts and in alloys with
corrosion/wear resistant uses. Cobalt is widely used in batteries
and in electroplating. Cobalt salts are used to impart blue and
green colors in glass and ceramics. Radioactive 60Co is used in the
treatment of cancer. Cobalt is essential to many living creatures
and is a component of vitamin B12. Cobalt is also used in
samarium-cobalt permanent magnets. These are used in guitar pickups
and high speed motors. Several cobalt compounds are used in chemical
reactions as oxidation catalysts. Cobalt-based catalysts are also
important in reactions involving carbon monoxide.
Which leads to requiring, at a minimum, an
increase of 30% to 50% more cobalt within these next 5 years.
The sources of cobalt are from mines and from
recycling, with mining being the predominate source. Today, some
cobalt is produced specifically from various metallic-lustered ores,
for example cobaltite (CoAsS), but the main source of the element is
as a by-product of copper and nickel mining. The copper belt in the
Democratic Republic of the Congo and Zambia yields most of the
cobalt mined worldwide.
Sources
Mined
Recycled
72%
28%
Currently the total world production is about
124,000 metric tons/year (2014 112,000) with about 50% coming from
the Congo (Kishasa), where it is primarily mined by artisanal miners
who sell the ore to foreign companies, mainly in China.. Much of the
cobalt is produced as a by-product from copper.
Mine
production |
|||
2014 |
2015e |
Reserves |
|
United States |
120 |
700 |
23,000 |
Australia |
5,980 |
6,000 |
1,100,000 |
Brazil |
2,600 |
2,600 |
78,000 |
Canada |
6,570 |
6,300 |
240,000 |
China(note) |
7,200 |
7,200 |
80,000 |
Congo (Kinshasa) |
63,000 |
63,000 |
3,400,000 |
Cuba |
3,700 |
4,200 |
500,000 |
Madagascar |
3,100 |
3,600 |
130,000 |
New Caledonia |
4,040 |
3,300 |
200,000 |
Philippines |
4,600 |
4,600 |
250,000 |
Russia |
6,300 |
6,300 |
250,000 |
South Africa |
3,000 |
2,800 |
31,000 |
Zambia |
5,500 |
5,500 |
270,000 |
Other countries |
7,080 |
7,700 |
610,000 |
Note - China mined
production is much less than China processed production. China is
the major finished product processor.
Again assuming a relative mined to recycle
ratio, this requires an increase of 37,000 to 60,000 additional
tonnes mined. Or put another way, a new Congo sized production
capacity in 5 years.
Anybody know any good prospects? I’ll gladly
work with you on developing it.
o
40+ years’ experience in the mining industry with strong mineral
processing experience in precious metals, copper, industrial
minerals, coal, and phosphate
o
Operational experience in precious metals, coal, and phosphate plus
in petrochemicals.
o
Extensive experience performing studies and determining feasibility
in the US and international (United States, Canada, Mexico, Ecuador,
Columbia, Venezuela, Chile, China, India, Indonesia, and Greece).
o
E-mail:
info@smartdogmining.com